Archive for sustainability

Sustainable New Year’s Resolutions

Posted in Sustainability with tags , on December 30, 2011 by John Olson

The dawn of the New Year is approaching. The buzz of the New Year’s Resolution is beginning to consume the void space of the radio stations. The typical resolutions are out there – exercise more, eat less fast food, get organized, spend less money, save more money, etc. Most of us will not see these resolutions through the month of January, yet we may spend a lot of money to attempt getting there.

Too often, we make resolutions that are out of reach. An incremental approach can be taken to get to a sustainable future. I will try to provide a few resolutions that will hopefully be a gateway toward a sustainable future.

1. Make Recycling Easy: Purchase two new waste receptacles for your home kitchen. The receptacles should be different sizes. You should label the largest of the two as Recycling, and the smaller as, Landfill. For an office setting, transform your waste receptacle into a recycling receptacle and hang a small container over the side for waste. The image below appropriately shows the hierarchy of waste in an office setting.

  • Bonus Points: Purchase a small metal bucket and label it as compost.

2. Go Bagless: Instead of choosing “Paper or Plastic” or even bringing your own bag, tell the cashier ‘no thank you.’ This can be accomplished with the use of crates. Purchase a few crates, collapsible or not, and store them in your trunk. After the grocery store scans your items, simply put them back in the cart, wheel it to your vehicle and load the crates. When you get home from the store, simply carry the crates in the house rather than bags. Crates are a much more durable item than cloth bags which can rip over time (see The Cloth Shopping Bag Post).

  • Bonus Points: Purchase a collapsible grocery cart and walk to the store saving bags and emissions.

3. Make Your Exercise Meaningful: Instead of paying to join an expensive gym, try changing your transportation habits. Walk or bicycle to the store, work, school, etc. Meaningful exercise is a powerful way to save time, money and stay healthy. A study published in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine in September 2008 showed that “a man of average height and weight (6 feet, 200 pounds) weighed 10 pounds less if he lived in a walkable neighborhood versus a less walkable neighborhood. A woman of average size (about 5-foot-5, 149 pounds), weighed six pounds less.”

  • Bonus Points: Move closer to where you work to make exercise more meaningful.

4. Grow Your Own Food: Gardening has several benefits to people who span from the personal pocketbook to education. The garden has always been commonplace, however its popularity has increased over the past few years. Kids seems to be more excited about eating vegetables when they are involved in the process of gardening the vegetable. At a recent conference in Colorado Springs, Debra Eschmeyer of FoodCorps said that a common statement from kids involved with their gardening program is “We grew it, so we like it a lot more.”

  • Bonus Points: Remove high water-use turf areas and replace with a garden.

Reduce, Reduce, Reduce: Decreasing waste, water and energy use all start with Reduction. The natural effects of the recession has been to cut back on purchasing, primarily as a means to save money. There are many things that we can purchase to be sustainable, but the easiest thing to do is to decrease the amount of items that we purchase, or choosing items that are not disposable.

Happy Sustainable New Year!

2011 Fort Carson Sustainability Awards at the Colorado Sustainability Conference

Posted in Events, Sustainability with tags , , on December 14, 2011 by John Olson

Each year, Fort Carson honors Installation personnel and community stakeholders with Sustainability Awards from Fort Carson. I was one of the honored recipients of the award this year. This was a tremendous honor not only to receive the award but to be in the company of so many great “Sustainability Warriors” in the community and on Fort Carson. Others honored include Frank Kinder, Bob Mooney, Ann and Eric Fetsch, Colonel Jonathan Gibbs, Donald Chase, Greg Willis, Carrie McCausland, Nick Kittle, and Captain Daniel J. Kull.  The honor was great for me, but as I mentioned, it made it all the better to have such amazing company.  To read more about each individual, continue to the article on the following link.

Full Article: Fort Carson Honors Installation and Community Leaders in Sustainability

Frank Kinder of Colorado Springs Utilities accepts a Sustainability Award from Fort Carson at the 2011 Colorado Sustainability Conference.

2011 Colorado Sustainability Conference Recap and Tweet Preservation

Posted in Events, Sustainability with tags , , , , on November 18, 2011 by John Olson

The Colorado Sustainability Conference wrapped up today at the Antler’s Hilton in Downtown Colorado Springs. It may be because it has wrapped up and I am still full of energy from it, but I do not hesitate to say that it was the best conference that I have attended in Southern Colorado. Great job Catamount Institute and Sustainable Fort Carson!

The progress that has been made in Southern Colorado is simply amazing, and this occurs in a time that the economy is suffering.  I have compiled a few notes from the sessions that I was able to attend, but it will only give a glimpse of the breadth of information from the conference. Some of the notes… most of the notes, are actually tweets. This is a great way to preserve the tweets, however.

Toward Net Zero Water:

This was a session that I facilitated, so my notes were extremely limited. Perhaps if I were like “Sustainovator,” Nick Kittle, who managed to tweet while serving as the Master of Ceremony for the Conference I could have done both, something to aspire for in the future conferences. How do you do it Nick?

I do wish to recognize the speakers in the Toward Net Zero Water session though, because I was extremely proud and impressed by their presentations and professional input.  Our presenters were Kate McMordie Stoughton and Liz Gardener. We had a great Q & A session afterwards where Kate and Liz were joined by Zach Collins, Scott Clark, Curtis Mitchell and David Takeda. Very nice job all!

Luncheon and Keynote Speaker Joel Bourne, National Geographic Contributing Writer

If the bottom Evers falls out on ethanol, we can always drink it.” – Nebraska Farmer

Negative: Projection of water levels to increase by 1 meter by end of the century, due to melting of glaciers, Climate Change.

Negative: The wars of the future will not be fought over oil, but water.

Negative: Studies show 4x ratio in biomass between jelly fish to other fish.

Positive: More than half the fish we eat, come from Aquaculture.

Opportunity: Switchgrass. No need 4 fertilizers, little water

Silver Buck Shot for Food security in 2050

  1. Stop cutting down forests
  2. Close yield gap in hunger zones
  3. More crop per drop, efficient irrigation
  4. Eat less meat
  5. Reduce food waste

What’s Next for Net Zero Energy? Presenters: Tom Hootman, Pete Jefferson, Shanti Pless

@JO_Urbanist: Tom Hootman, RNL: Training Wheels as a Metaphor for LEED. #NetZero requires Climate Responsive Design

  • Some of the buildings just cannot get to Net Zero, so over compensation on buildings such as parking structures is necessary. – Pete
  • Designing buildings prior to electricity and operate as passive as possible. South & north facades daylighting as much as possible… 60-ft span is ideal. -Shanti
  • Owner is critical, cannot simply hire a design build team to get there. -Shanti
  • RFP was critical: no drawings, RFP for NREL Net Zero Building was Performance-based. -Shanti
  • Almost critical to have member of the design build team occupying a space in the building for the first year. -Shanti
  • For every watt saved continuously, it is $33 of PV that is not needed (to get to Net Zero).

Friday Opening Keynote: Growing Healthy Kids and Communities: What can we learn from the Business of School Lunch? Presenter: Debra Eschmeyer, FoodCorps (All Notes were via Twitter)

@Catamount_Inst: “You shouldn’t have to win the lottery to have a healthy lunch” #2011CSC

@JO_Urbanist: ”There are more prisoners today than Farmers” #2011CSC

@Catamount_Inst: Pizza is a vegetable? Congress says yes!? #2011CSC Unacceptable. Even kids know pizza is not a vegetable.

@Catamount_Inst: ”Children participating in Farm to School programs consume an increase of one serving of fruits and vegetables per day” #2011CSC @foodcorps

@JO_Urbanist: School Gardens, Cooking & Taste Tests, and Farm Tours. Great work by @FoodCorps #2011CSC

@JO_Urbanist: @FoodCorps not serving in#Colorado ? We need to fix that! #2011CSC Such a great Org!

@JO_Urbanist: 1000 schools will receive $2000 grants for School Gardens from @FoodCorps Apply Today! #2011CSC

@kittlent: more prisoners than farmers is shocking info. Pizza is a veggie? Ridiculous! @foodcorps is doing great work! #2011CSC

@JO_Urbanist: ”We grew it so we like it a lot more.” via @FoodCorps #2011CSC

@USGBCCOSouth: What a great program the @FoodCorps just presented. Local and healthy food for school lunches, yes please!#2011CSC

@JO_Urbanist: ”More about the proper relationship with food than obesity.” Healthy eating. @FoodCorps #2011CSC

@JO_Urbanist: ”Amazing that cooking shows are so popular, but nobody is cooking.” @FoodCorps #2011CSC

10 Sniglets to a Better World Presenter: Nick Kittle (@kittlent)

@JO_Urbanist: @kittlent Ten Sniglets to a Better World: Transportimobilification; Fiscifoolish; Shuggleftulation; Motodrift; Backspackle… #2011CSC

@JO_Urbanist: @kittlent Snigglets cont’d: Spubbling; Innovention; Sustainovation; Gapiana; Scandroids Good stuff! Ask Nick what they mean. #2011CSC

@JO_Urbanist: @kittlent Technology Adoption Lifecycle. Great stuff! #2011CSC Please send original Nick, love it! lockerz.com/s/157275870

@CollinsAE: @kittlent #sniglets #sustainovation Funniest presentation at the #2011CSC.

@JO_Urbanist: @kittlent “Spubbling: if it is a pain to use a product, it won’t happen… Avoid it!” #2011CSC

@Catamount_Inst: A view of the room with lots of laughing. Great work @kittlent on teaching people about sniglets! #2011CSC http://t.co/QkfRe5Zy

@JO_Urbanist: @kittlent “Not a tree hugger, I’m a tree planter” #2011CSC

@JO_Urbanist: @kittlent “Are we good about rallying around an idea, or are we good at bringing it down?” #2011CSC

@Catamount_Inst: Time for the breakouts! go check out @RiestererLaw or the other great sessions we have! #2011CSC

@JO_Urbanist: Great props given @StrongTowns & @Richard_Florida by @kittlent at the #2011CSC

Green Leases: Removing Obstacles to LEED Certification: Presenter: Ryan Riesterer & Meghan Riesterer

@JO_Urbanist: @RiestererLaw “Green Leases are not simple, but it doesn’t mean that they can’t be achieved.” #2011CSC

@kittlent: #COSprings has @RiestererLaw teaching on green leases: Use a bilateral approach & negotiate on key points. Be prepared! #2011CSC

@kittlent: #2011CSC “to negotiate green leases, you need split incentives” b/w landlords and tenants said @RiestererLaw

@kittlent: #2011CSC @RiestererLaw has a talented partner who says measurement is a key to successful green lease partnerships

@JO_Urbanist: @RiestererLaw Tenants could be protected by 20% performance buffer for leaser/leasee in Green Lease. Mutual 3rd Party Energy Verif #2011CSC

@JO_Urbanist: Include good realtor, attorney, local utility in your process of establishing a Green Lease. #2011CSC @RiestererLaw

Colorado Springs Sustainability Bike Tour 2011: Recap

Posted in Events, Sustainability with tags , , , , , on July 18, 2011 by John Olson

Another successful Sustainability Bicycle Tour is now behind us in Colorado Springs.  On Saturday, July 16, 2011, approximately fifty people participated in the three-stage Sustainability Bike Tour.  We were extremely pleased with the turn out for the event and thankful to be joined by two of the newest City Council Members, Lisa Czelatdko and Tim Leigh.

The intentions of the bicycle tour were for the attendees to get a better understanding of the otherwise hidden sustainability features of our great city.  The Bicycle Tour was book-ended at Gold Hill Mesa where we had the opportunity to listen to the on-site developer of the neo-traditional neighborhood, Bob Willard, speak about why Gold Hill Mesa is sustainable.  He referenced what sustainability means to him and how it is being met at Gold Hill Mesa.

For those of you who are unfamiliar with Gold Hill Mesa, it is a neo-traditional neighborhood constructed in what was previously the tailing of a historic Gold Mine.  It is located between downtown Colorado Springs and Pikes Peak near Historic Old Colorado City.  Major environmental impacts were mitigated to create a neighborhood that will ultimately be a self-sufficient automobile-independent neighborhood.  Without the major commitment that Mr. Willard and his fellow partners have taken at Gold Hill Mesa, the hill would remain as a blighted eyesore near downtown Colorado Springs.

In his brief statements, Mr. Willard mentioned a key component of sustainability—that is that a place is not sustainable without the right economics.  Sustainability must consider the Triple Bottom Line, or People, Planet, Profit.

If you are a consistent reader of this blog, you probably have a good grasp of the understanding the triple bottom line and that sustainability begins with the bones of the place.  You understand that the transportation networks in and around a place are crucial to the economic vitality.  Too often, the achievement of sustainability does not consider the fossil fuels required in transport or the economics required making sustainability occur.  For example, the most energy-efficient place that requires fifty miles of daily transport is still far from sustainable. The same is true for the highly rated, super-gizmo building that does not see a return on investment for 30-plus years.

In addition to learning about Gold Hill Mesa, other themes of the Sustainability Bike Tour included the importance of adaptive reuse, bicycle infrastructure, community amenities, urban agriculture and local sustainable foods.  (Photos from the bicycle tour will come soon in a separate blog post).

In the next blog post, Infill: A Term with a Variety of Scales, I will write further about the infill sites that were visited throughout the bicycle tour including specific data from the El Paso County Assessor site regarding a few of them.

Has Technology Made Us Lazy as a Civilization?

Posted in Comprehensive Planning and Codes, Landscape Architecture, Sustainability with tags , , , , , , on May 9, 2011 by John Olson

My fear is that technology and innovation have almost made our civilization regress at an inverse relationship to innovation. Don’t misinterpret my statement.  I love technology as much as the next person, just ask my iPad sitting next to me.  We cannot take the word of the specialists as seriously as we once could.

Many of the goals in development in today’s society revolve around sustainability.  Sustainability in its simplest terms equals self-sufficient or independent.  Very few places are capable of claiming to be self-sufficient, but you can bet that many do claim to be sustainable on a daily basis.  If a place is ‘sustainable’, it is usually because it is not yet efficient to be dependent on others, or it is a conscious effort to be that way.

A tree lawn that is constructed to infiltrate rainwater is more cost-effective than piping stormwater and provides supplemental irrigation. Copyright, Olson Planning & Urban Landscapes, 2011. All rights reserved.

Consider storm drainage as an example of our failures from innovation.  Prior to the highly effective mode of storm sewer pipes, manholes, etc., drainage used to be handled above grade, through infiltration.  Today, this “new” innovation is referred to as “Green Infrastructure”, “Low Impact Development,” or “Light Imprint.”  This is not anything new, this was common sense and at one time, the most cost-effective thing to do.  In all actuality it still is the most cost-effective, though not used as often because it is much more main-stream (no pun intended), to design pipe infrastructure.  If you are a civil engineer who is a specialist at designing pipe infrastructure, your efficiency is not readily available to think in terms of infiltration.

This fundamental problem with “specialists” reminds me of an interaction I had a few years ago with a transportation engineer.  There was discussion of considering mass transit along a corridor in lieu of extensive highway widening equipped with miles of concrete clover leafs.  When mass transit was brought up, this particular engineer told me quite candidly that “these sorts of things should not be brought up in a public meeting.”  I asked why, and his response was “well, I don’t know how to design that.”  This response has remained in my head since as a problem with our society as I am sure that this was not isolated to this individual only.

The following is an excerpt from a great book titled “Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution.” It exposes one additional element of that contributes to the over-design of our places:

“One reason that buildings are inefficient is that the compensation paid to architects and engineers is frequently based directly or indirectly on a percentage of the cost of the building itself or of the equipment they specify for it. Designers who attempt to eliminate costly equipment therefore end up with lower fees, or at best with the same fees for a greater amount of work.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 924 other followers