Archive for Landscape Architecture

Urban Planning as a Satisfying Career

Posted in Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Design with tags , , , on June 24, 2011 by John Olson

The following is a reply to an email from a College student in Colorado Springs interested in the Planning/Landscape Architecture field of expertise.  I have received a few of these since opening my company and I always take the time to reply and help assist the future designers of our country.  I believe that it is our duty as designers to provide input outside of what can come from academia.  I am posting this to the blog to assist other student who may have similar questions.  I have removed all names and identifying characteristics from the email below to preserve anonymity for the student.

Hello Mr. Olson,

My name is —— ——, and I am a rising senior at ———- here in Colorado Springs. I study ——– and ———. I am very interested in pursuing a career in urban planning or landscape architecture. I was wondering if I could ask you a few questions about your job and the field of urban planning.

What is a standard day at the office like?

How did you break into the field?

What do you enjoy and dislike about your job?

Do you feel like urban planning is an intellectually and creatively satisfying career?

I would really appreciate any feedback you can give me.

Sincerely,

—— ——

Response:

Good evening ——,

I apologize for the amount of time that it took to get back to you, I am making my way through emails as I write this. The following are responses for you, hope that they are not too late for your needs.

1. What is a standard day at the office like?

A standard day for me actually includes very little time in the office. As a business owner with multiple responsibilities along with my involvement on miscellaneous boards and activism groups in Colorado Springs, I spend very little time actually in an office. I do have an office downtown at 409 N Tejon, where on a typical week, I might spend 20 hours. (I also spend a lot of time working from home in the evenings)

2. How did you break into the field?

I went to school at Kansas State University with 100% of my intentions to become an architect. At KSU, there is a minimum 5 year requirement for all students pursuing Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Interior Architecture for a Bachelor Degree. The first of the 5 years includes a rigorous program where all programs are together as one. It is both an exploratory year and a year that provides a glimpse of what the future 4 years will be like in any of the three disciplines. At KSU, as is the case at most schools, most do not continue to make it beyond year one.

It was in my first year that I discovered what Landscape Architecture really was and that it was truly my passion. My first full-time salary job introduced to me to the world of Planning, Urban Design, Smart Growth and New Urbanism. The combination of all of these drive my passion for urban design and landscape architecture today.

3. What do you enjoy and dislike about your job?

There is very little that I dislike about my job today, but I am self-employed so it’s hard to be mad at the boss. When I worked for others, I did not like to work on tedious design work that was not challenging. I always enjoy a great challenge and when I am told that something cannot be done, I get really excited about solving the problem. I have always been quite competitive in this way and it comes with great professional fulfillment.

4. Do you feel like urban planning is an intellectually and creatively satisfying career?

Absolutely. However, you should be aware that the field of urban planning is a very diverse discipline. Many people with the title “Planner” are policy planners, whereas a policy planner’s responsibility is to administer a code or verify compliance. This type of planning typically falls in the public sector, whereas the planner would work for a city, county or region. I get involved, and most excited about, the actual design segment of planning. Both are very important disciplines but you should know that there is a significant difference between the two types.

If you have any further questions, please let me know. Good luck in your future pursuits!

John W. Olson, RLA|LEED AP|CNU-a

Landscape Urbanism vs. New Urbanism: Review of the Discussion at CNU 19

Posted in Events, Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Design, Urbanism with tags , , , , , , , on June 6, 2011 by John Olson

This past Saturday evening, I attended a much-anticipated discussion about landscape urbanism, sometimes referred to as ecological urbanism, at the annual Congress organized by the CNU, or Congress for the New Urbanism, in Madison, Wisconsin. The Landscape Urbanism’s own Charles Waldheim led the discussion with a lecture on the history of the movement and how it does, and does not, relate to the new urbanism. According to Mr. Waldheim, Landscape Urbanism is a movement that is ten years old and was created in large part by the Harvard GSD, or Graduate School of Design.

Charles Waldheim presents the Landscape Urbanism at the closing plenary session at the Congress for the New Urbanism in Madison. 4 June 2011.

Much of what Mr. Waldheim had to present was illustrated examples of the intention of the landscape urbanism, including a lot of the work from the offices of Michael Van Valkenburg Associates, Inc. and James Corner’s Field Operations.

One of the very few examples of constructed work includes the High Line in New York City. The High Line is a beautiful reuse of otherwise undevelopable space providing ecological relief in an extremely dense city of nearly 20 million people. The High Line, and it’s “sequel” The High Line 2,” have recently been critiqued by Urbanist Witold Rybczynski in The New York Times.

The Landscape Urbanism, in my professional opinion as a landscape architect, is a useful movement in terms of a compliment towards the lower ends of the rural-to-urban transect (T-1, T-2 and T-3). This is the portion of the transect that the CNU, as an overall organization, is not as well-versed as the upper echelons of the transect. As the landscape urbanists continue their current endeavors in the United States and abroad, hopefully they can begin to understand the formulas currently practiced and proven by the new urbanists for the past 30 years.

Le Corbusier's Towers in the Park.

There is a fear, which was emphasized by Andres Duany, that landscape urbanists are confused regarding the difference between ‘urbanism‘ and ‘density‘. Case in point, high-rise buildings in a sea of parking, or in a sea of parks, do not provide the social experience that makes the place walkable nor livable. In most instances, these conditions create greater dependence on the automobile.

As I previously referenced one year ago, I wrote that my hopes were that the landscape urbanism movement could find a way to be included and incorporated into the new urbanism movement. I felt that there were many things that we could learn from each other. Upon seeing the confrontational and seemingly dismissive attitude toward the new urbanism by Mr. Waldheim, I am afraid that this is far from reality.

Because this is unlikely, my hope for the coming years in the Congress for the New Urbanism is that the CNU and it’s multi-disciplinary members can learn from the positive achievements of the landscape urbanism and perhaps incorporate an ecological, and edible landscape, where it is applicable, without jeopardizing the urbanism. “Having said that,” the CNU membership already includes several Landscape Architects, Civil Engineers and Urban Planners that are ecologically friendly– and that are already incorporating the ecological framework into a fabric of quality urbanism. Perhaps it is not the incorporation of the landscape urbanism that we should focus on. Perhaps there should be greater fostering and promotion of our own initiatives and suggestions, such as the Rainwater-in-Context Initiative and the Light Imprint Handbook.

Expert Witness Landscape Architect: An Educational and Fullfilling Experience

Posted in Landscape Architecture with tags , , on May 6, 2011 by John Olson

One statement is made to all college students interested in the architecture or landscape architecture profession.  That is that they will learn more in the first month of real experience on the job during an internship or their first year out of school that they learn in an entire year during college.  True statement, the amount that you can learn in real situations, with real clients and real mentors is incredible.

Every office has a unique niche of expertise.  I experienced working for three different landscape architecture/planning offices, each very different from each other.  Perhaps, this broad knowledge has given me my unique outlook on projects and the ability to be versatile in the profession of landscape architecture.

Last fall, I was asked to be an expert witness for a landscape architecture firm who was the defendant in a lawsuit which claimed negligence against the company.  Initially, I was admittedly hesitant as this was something that was foreign to me.

Full Story: The Fulfillment of Being an Expert Witness

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,366 other followers