Archive for CNU

Colorado LEED-ND Pilot Projects and Potential LEED-ND Candidates

Posted in Comprehensive Planning and Codes, Town Planning, Urban Planning and Design, Urban Renewal, Urbanism with tags , , , , , , , , on September 7, 2010 by John Olson

In a partnership with the Colorado chapters of the United States Green Building Council (USGBC) and the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU), I have volunteered to take on the task of identifying recently developed neighborhoods that may qualify for LEED-Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND).  LEED is an acronym for Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design with multiple rating systems including the most popular New Construction (or LEED-NC).

Stapleton (Denver)

The following are Colorado developments that are pilot projects for LEED-ND:

I have assembled several other new urban neighborhoods in the State of Colorado, which can also be found in CNU Colorado published book Colorado Urbanizing, that I feel have the potential to meet the requirements of LEED-ND.  Please send comments, etc. if you feel that I have missed a neighborhood that would qualify as this is meant to be a working list.

Full Story: Potential LEED-ND Candidates in Colorado 

Sprawl Repair: Conventional Suburban Neighborhoods

Posted in Comprehensive Planning and Codes, Town Planning, Urban Renewal, Urbanism with tags , , , , , , , , on June 16, 2010 by John Olson

There is a lot of talk today about retrofitting the abandoned properties in suburbia lately.  The majority of the conversation is shifted toward large abandoned shopping centers and other large abandoned tracts of land.  These are the easiest areas to fix due to the land typically under one or two ownerships.  However, the new subdivisions that have been constructed prior to the economic meltdown are suffering just as much.  There are some neighborhoods that have been completely devastated and abandoned by the foreclosure crisis created from the bad adjustable loans that were once available.  This has been a big concern of mine as I have read many of the articles written by Christopher Leinberger such as “The Next Slum.”

While I was considering this over this past weekend, I put the pencil to paper and doodled with some watercolor pencils.  The first image below is of a typical conventional subdivision, with what is typically known as a “Snout House” in the planning profession.  It is called a snout house due to its resemblance of a dog’s face, with the garage as the “snout” of the house.  Snout houses are notorious for having the garage as a predominant feature of the home.

This is a quick rendering snapshot of a conventional suburban developement (CSD).

The following image is what I consider to be a sprawl repair alternative to the conventional subdivision.  The image illustrates an addition to the home toward the street, located at the garage.  By doing this, the garage opening is shifted to the side of the home and utilizes a shared driveway with the neighboring home.  This configuration allows separation between the actual home  and the addition by way of garage so the addition has added flexibility.  The addition toward the street could lend itself to multiple purposes, from an office, to a studio and it could even work as a stand-alone retail store or coffee shop.  The addition could also simply be an addition to the home, perhaps as an accessory dwelling unit or a recreation/media room.  Located above the addition to the front of the home, could easily be utilized as a rooftop terrace, deck, etc. to be accessed from one of the bedrooms (typical use above garages of snout houses).

This suburban retrofit shows the typical snout house with its garage opening turned away from public view. The addition of building toward the street and accessory dwelling units could help the CSD's compete with newer subdivisions in suburban locations.

Aside from the addition to the actual home, stand-alone accessory dwelling units can be located in the rear yards of the lots or between the lots if the side setback is great enough (realistically need a 15-ft side-yard setback for each home).  This could allow the conventional subdivision to gain new life and vitality through growth and change.  Too often, subdivisions are isolated from other uses and are very homogenous in respect to architecture, value of home, etc.

Landscape Urbanism: A critigue from a CNU Cardholder and Landscape Architect

Posted in Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Design, Urbanism with tags , , , , , , , on April 27, 2010 by John Olson

An illustration of the green infrastructure and ecology proposed by Metrograma for Milan as an example of how Landscape Urbanism plays a role in guiding the framework for a city.

 Landscape Urbanism sounds like a great name that really mesh together a lot of what I believe in and do as a professional. So much that I had considered a company name of “Olson Planning & Landscape Urbanism“, until I did some research about what is defined as “landscape urbanism.” According to Wikipedia (great source, right?): Landscape Urbanism is a theory of urbanism arguing that landscape, rather than architecture, is more capable of organizing the city and enhancing the urban experience.  I emphasized the portion of the definition above that I couldn’t get past.  

Although I feel that landscape and the work of landscape architects is critical in creating great places, there is no substitute for great urbanity defined by the structures.  There are instances that I have come across where the building, due to its initial intended use, do not allow some of the features of architecture to frame the street and give the vitality.  Using a lot of the principles of architecture, hopefully the landscape can create place-making and pedestrian experience.  Time will tell on its abilities to do so.

I do not feel that landscape is a fair substitute for good quality architecture but a tremendous companion.  As Landscape Urbanism continues to evolve, I hope that it is embraced by New Urbanism and the New Urbanist community as a compliment to new urbanism and a substitute only when necessary.  It has some very strong arguments, but can not be a substitute for quality architecture.  The two movements need to work together hand-in-hand.  Landscape Architects play a critical role in shaping our cities, however it is a difficult argument to say that landscape can enhance the urban experience better than architecture.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,059 other followers