Archive for the Urban Renewal Category

Classifying Suburbia

Posted in Comprehensive Planning and Codes, Urban Planning and Design, Urban Renewal with tags , , on January 27, 2013 by John Olson

The question came up over the weekend regarding retrofitting suburbia, due to the anticipated arrival of speaker, author and urbanist, Ellen Dunham Jones. My friend and colleague asked where in Colorado Springs would be the places that Ellen describes in her TED Talk. It was a question that really deserved more than a short response, so I offered this impromptu classification of ‘suburbia‘:

  1. Future Suburbia: Areas on the periphery of cities which market themselves as “outside the city“. These would include larger lots ‘away from the city‘, or even clusters of homes with a buffer of undeveloped land between them and the city. Residents here enjoy quiet evenings and low traffic. Most do not believe that their community will ever be a part of the city. Due to the high cost of maintenance infrastructure per tax dollar, a responsible city government would not choose to annex it into the city. Geographically and by association however, they are Future Suburbia.
  2. Marketed Suburbia: These are the shiny, new, clean areas of the community, which actually market themselves as suburban and away from the chaos of the city, but include the new amenities of a large city (big box retail, new restaurants, kid-oriented amenities, etc.). They often tout safety and great schools as a part of the marketing strategies. Market values are generally at their peak in the first five years of construction. If you can continue to ride the wave of living in marketed suburbia before the crash of the wave, you will enjoy the life modern adjacent amenities, albeit with an automobile dependent lifestyle. Franchises and retail businesses that plan for obsolescence (build with the plan of vacation in a specific range of years) do very well in these locations while the location remains in the marketed suburbia portion of the community. At some point, they will become the former suburbs, and even worst yet, the forgotten suburbs. Yes, I speak from experience, read Quantifying the Effects of Suburban Living for more.
  3. Former Suburbia: Former Suburbia flirts with the needs of a Suburban Retrofit, as Ellen references in Retrofitting Suburbia. They include homes, strip malls, and pad sites that are on their third or fourth owner/company/tenant. The strip malls are not completely vacant in the former suburbs, but close to it. They are basically doing well enough that the owner can offset the decrease in rent. Little to no profit is being made here. Tenants may include pawn shops, advanced paycheck shops, and as of a couple of years ago in Colorado, medical marijuana. The residents may be paying a low rent for a larger home, however the buildings and home materials are in need of repair in Former Suburbia.
  4. Forgotten Suburbia: The areas classified as Forgotten Suburbia are otherwise considered modern-day slums. They consist of strip malls, pad sites, and homes that people do not want to be in. Generally, they are in disrepair and are begging for a retrofit. Unfortunately, it is difficult for someone to develop these parcels because the adjacent properties are still a major negative. Ideally, these would be the first to be redeveloped, but on the other hand they become very difficult because there is large-scale decay in the areas.

So what could be concluded from this is that ideally, a suburban retrofit is most needed in Forgotten Suburbia. However, it may be more financially effective to conduct a retrofit in Former Suburbia. The decay of suburbia is quite powerful in cities. Suburbia moves swiftly with green horizons. It has a clean exterior skin with a slightly less clean layer inside of it. Inside of that is the decay. Even further in, at the core of the city, is the truly sustained downtown of a city.

The core, or in some instances, multiple cores, are the portions of the city, where decay is less likely. In Colorado Springs, we have one primary core, that is our Downtown. It must be nurtured and given the greatest level of priority. We also have other nuclei of places that greatness can radiate from: Old Colorado City; Manitou Springs; Fort Carson; Air Force Academy; Schriever Air Force Base; Peterson Air Force Base; Colorado College; University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Pikes Peak Community College; US Olympic Training Center; and our loved parks and natural amenities.

Suburban retrofits can make changes to the pattern of this decay, creating interventionist pockets of positive energy. Occasionally, they can be incredibly strong and really improve the landscape of a larger region. These are the retrofits that Ellen and June Williamson speak of in Retrofitting Suburbia.

Retrofitting at the Scale of the Block

Posted in Comprehensive Planning and Codes, Town Planning, Urban Renewal, Urbanism with tags , , , , on May 3, 2012 by John Olson

Retrofitting Suburbia is an interesting discussion that has been widely discussed in the architecture and planning groups for the past decade. This has been the era that we have been able to see, too often, the failures of our development patterns since World War II. Products of the discussion include a few very good mall and strip mall retrofits, most notably and locally, Belmar in the suburb of Denver.

Of course there were also two amazing books that were the product of the discussion: Retrofitting Suburbia and The Sprawl Repair Manual. I have provided links on the titles of these two books to make ordering even easier if you have not already read them.

Something that has not been implemented at quite the frequency necessary is the idea of retrofitting entire blocks of abandoned, or dilapidated, single-family residential. This is a very tedious process with not only layers of red tape, but also several property owners to purchase the lots from to assemble the block. This begs the question though if we really need to have sole possession of a block to assemble a large-scale retrofit.

La Familia Community Garden in Pueblo (Image from Garden Facebook Page)

There has to be a minimal quantity or percentage of homes that can be effective at a block-scale or even neighborhood-scale retrofit. One is rarely enough to make a difference, but the power of one lot can be enough to excite the others. In the instance of the La Familia Community Garden project in Pueblo, Colorado, one lot was all that was necessary to re-energize and unite a distressed neighborhood.

Steve Mouzon presented his 12-Step Program for Sprawl Repair at a CNU Colorado event a few weeks ago. The first step in Sprawl Repair, according to Steve, is to provide the necessary civic space. He added that a single foreclosed lot could add value to a neighborhood by providing a small park or community space. Many subdivisions are lacking this small pocket park feature at a walkable distance. Generally, the acceptable rule-of-thumb is 5-minutes or 1/4 of a mile. Of course, as I have previously pointed out in the post: The Five Minute Walk: Calibrated to the Pedestrian, this 1/4 mile rule of thumb is only a guideline. Steve swiftly and accurately points out that it has much more to do with the Pedestrian Propulsion of the area than the actual distance.

In Denver, Living City Block is an organization who is considering retrofits in a different vein. Instead of focusing on the two ends of the spectrum, single-family home vs the large high-rise building, Living City Block is attempting to assist the small to medium-sized buildings in between. The idea, which is summarized beautifully by Emily Badger in this Atlantic Cities article (Greening an Entire Block Instead of Just One Building), is to compile the utility bills for several users into a single account with the utility company. This provides a cost-effective means to make retrofits with a greater Return on Investment, or ROI, that may not be feasible for the sole building owner.

This is very fascinating to me, because it makes me wonder how many other things are possible at the neighborhood scale. Could we take this idea to another level in our own neighborhoods? Is it possible under our own homeowners associations? Could we combine the partnership opportunities presented in Living City Block with Steve’s notion of scraping an abandoned home in favor of civic space? How does the neighborhood as a whole benefit?

Off of the top of my head, the most fundamental retrofit is to combine the exterior lawn maintenance of a neighborhood under the same entity, but hey that’s coming from a landscape architect. Even if it is just the front lawn, there is a great deal of money to be saved in a landscape retrofit, especially with appropriately managed irrigation systems with sensors installed.

I would love to hear your thoughts on this. Please comment below or send me an email at john@evstudio.com.

A Vision for Memorial Park in Colorado Springs

Posted in Urban Renewal with tags , , , , on August 28, 2011 by John Olson

An image of Prospect Lake during the Annual Balloon Festival over Labor Day in Colorado Springs. Image from Springsgov.com

Colorado Springs’ City Councilman Tim Leigh has a vision for Prospect Lake at Memorial Park in Colorado Springs.  Memorial Park is a centrally located urban park only one mile from the urban center of Colorado Springs.  As Mr. Leigh emphasizes in the flyer below, Prospect Lake is one of the few places in Colorado Springs where residents and visitors can enjoy the beach.

If you are interested in partnering with Mr. Leigh, he can be contacted at Tim@TimLeigh.com or by phone at 719.337.9551.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,366 other followers